Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Innov Aging ; 6(Suppl 1):32, 2022.
Article in English | PubMed Central | ID: covidwho-2188755

ABSTRACT

Personal networks are a key component in the provision of social support for older adults. Such support is particularly critical during the COVID-19 pandemic, when traditional avenues of social engagement or assistance are disrupted. Here, we use nationally representative data from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project that assesses older adults' pre-pandemic personal networks and receiving instrumental help and emotional support during the pandemic. We find that larger pre-pandemic confidant networks predict higher odds of receiving needed help and support, higher odds of receiving help and support more often than before the pandemic, and lower odds of being unable to get help. Denser pre-pandemic networks also predict higher odds of receiving instrumental help and support during the pandemic, while having a greater proportion of kin in pre-pandemic networks predicts higher odds of receiving pandemic help for non-white older adults only. Together, results suggest that features of older adults' pre-pandemic confidant network structure and composition can provide underlying conditions for receiving social support during the pandemic.

2.
J Clin Virol ; 146: 105053, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1561863

ABSTRACT

Throughout the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the recommended sample type for initial diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection has been a nasopharyngeal swab. Shortages in swabs and difficulties in obtaining nasopharyngeal swabs in certain patient groups has prompted research into alternative specimen types for the diagnosis of COVID-19. The aim of this study was to assess how 'simply collected' saliva along with tongue swabs and buccal swabs preformed as an alternative specimen type for SARS-CoV-2 detection. It was observed that saliva samples allowed for the detection of 85.3% of positive patients, tongue swabs allowed for the detection of 67.6% of positive patients and buccal swabs allowed for detection of 20.8% of positive patients, when compared to nasopharyngeal swabs. From this data, it could be concluded that using simple saliva collection can provide a less invasive and reliable alternative method for the detection of SARS-CoV2 particularly in those patients where invasive sampling is difficult and where regular repeat testing is required.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , Nasopharynx , RNA, Viral , Saliva , Specimen Handling , Tongue
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL